Off Topic A place to boldly go off topic. just about anything goes.

I feel like whoring it up 2 (official new whoring thread)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #2311  
Old 03-27-2012 | 03:41 PM
aszrael1266's Avatar
The Dude
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,538
From: C.A.
Default

Originally Posted by Dragone#19
Rascal is a 9 yr old Staffordshire Terrier. He has helped me raise 9 kids, but yes, his patience runs thin with the pup. He growled at her once and she pissed herself. lol A work in progress right now. He goes outside, she follows every move. The biggest issue right now is that she still wants to suckle. The male is sidestepping big time! lol
I know there is a "know how I know your gay" joke in there someplace lol
 
  #2312  
Old 03-27-2012 | 03:47 PM
Dragone#19's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18,288
From: The Silver State
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by aszrael1266
I know there is a "know how I know your gay" joke in there someplace lol

hahaha, you would too.
 
  #2313  
Old 03-27-2012 | 05:04 PM
aszrael1266's Avatar
The Dude
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,538
From: C.A.
Default

Originally Posted by Dragone#19
hahaha, you would too.
touche
 
  #2314  
Old 03-28-2012 | 03:22 PM
wedge's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,433
From: Olympia WA
Default

whats up ******!?!?!
 
  #2315  
Old 03-28-2012 | 03:47 PM
aszrael1266's Avatar
The Dude
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,538
From: C.A.
Default

Just another rainy day here. Should be clear tomorrow but I can't take the bike out. I'm waiting on the master cylinder to come in. I hope its in by friday so I can toss it on and ride sunday.
 
  #2316  
Old 03-28-2012 | 05:18 PM
jeffzx9's Avatar
Super Moderator
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,350
From: Clarksville, OH
Default

I know this thread is pretty much the "lint trap" for topics that don't really fit anywhere else.
I came across this article on "Clean Oil Reduces Engine Fuel Consumption" by Jim Fitch of Noria Corporation. Thought I would pass along a portion of it for your review/information/thoughts:

When a lubricant degrades, it forms reaction products that become insoluble and corrosive. So too, the original properties of lubricity and dispersancy can become impaired as the lubricant ages and additives deplete. Much has been published about the risks associated with overextended oil drains and the buildup of carbon insolubles from combustion blow-by.

However, surprisingly little has been said about the impact of fine abrasives in a lube oil as it relates to fuel economy over the engine’s life. One can imagine numerous scenarios in which solid abrasives suspended in the oil could diminish optimum energy performance. Below is a list of several scenarios:

•Antiwear Additive Depletion. High soot load of crankcase lubricants has been reported to impair the performance of ZDDP antiwear additives. Some researchers believe that soot and dust particles exhibit polar absorbencies, and as such, can tie-up the AW additive and diminish its ability to control friction in boundary contacts (cam nose, ring/ liner, etc.).
•Combustion Efficiency Losses. Sooner or later, wear from abrasive particles and deposits from carbon and oxide insolubles will interfere with efficient combustion in an engine. Valve train wear (cams, valve guides, etc.) can impact timing and valve movement. Wear of rings, pistons and liners influences volumetric compression efficiency and combustion blow-by resulting in power loss. As has been previously reported in this magazine, particle-induced wear is greatest when the particle sizes are in the same range as the oil film thickness (Figure 2). For diesel and gasoline engines, there are a surprising number of laboratory and field studies that report the need to control particles below ten microns. One such study by GM concluded that, “controlling particles in the 3 to 10 micron range had the greatest impact on wear rates and that engine wear rates correlated directly to the dust concentration levels in the sump.”1
•Frictional Losses. When hard clear- ance-size particles disrupt oil films, including boundary chemical films, increased friction and wear will occur. One researcher reports that 40 to 50 percent of the friction losses of an engine are attributable to the ring/cylinder contacts, with two-thirds of the loss assigned to the upper compression ring.2 It has been documented that there is an extremely high level of sensitivity at the ring-to-cylinder zone of the engine to both oil- and air-borne contaminants. Hence, abrasive wear of the ring/cylinder area of the engine translates directly to increased friction, blow-by, compression losses and reduced fuel economy.
•Viscosity Churning Losses. Wear particles contribute to oxidative thickening of aged oil. High soot load and/or lack of soot dispersancy can also have a large impact on oil viscosity increases. Viscosity-related internal fluid friction not only increases fuel consumption but also generates more heat that can lead to premature degradation of additives and base oil oxidation.
•Stiction Losses. Deposits in the combustion chamber and valve area can lead to restriction movements in rings and valve control. When hard particle contamination agglomerates with soot and sludge to form adherent deposits between valves and guides, a tenacious interference, called stiction, results. Stiction causes power loss. It causes the timing of the port openings and closings to vary, leading to incomplete combustion and risk of backfiring. Advanced phases of this problem can lead to a burned valve seat.

What I take away from this article is a.) keep your oil changed regularly, and b.) change your oil and air filters, too, and c.) the more particulate and junk you have in your dirty oil, the harder your engine must work, and the less efficient it becomes. Pretty obvious stuff, but now you know why.
 
  #2317  
Old 03-28-2012 | 10:31 PM
Dragone#19's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18,288
From: The Silver State
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by jeffzx9
I know this thread is pretty much the "lint trap" for topics that don't really fit anywhere else.
I came across this article on "Clean Oil Reduces Engine Fuel Consumption" by Jim Fitch of Noria Corporation. Thought I would pass along a portion of it for your review/information/thoughts:

When a lubricant degrades, it forms reaction products that become insoluble and corrosive. So too, the original properties of lubricity and dispersancy can become impaired as the lubricant ages and additives deplete. Much has been published about the risks associated with overextended oil drains and the buildup of carbon insolubles from combustion blow-by.

However, surprisingly little has been said about the impact of fine abrasives in a lube oil as it relates to fuel economy over the engine’s life. One can imagine numerous scenarios in which solid abrasives suspended in the oil could diminish optimum energy performance. Below is a list of several scenarios:

•Antiwear Additive Depletion. High soot load of crankcase lubricants has been reported to impair the performance of ZDDP antiwear additives. Some researchers believe that soot and dust particles exhibit polar absorbencies, and as such, can tie-up the AW additive and diminish its ability to control friction in boundary contacts (cam nose, ring/ liner, etc.).
•Combustion Efficiency Losses. Sooner or later, wear from abrasive particles and deposits from carbon and oxide insolubles will interfere with efficient combustion in an engine. Valve train wear (cams, valve guides, etc.) can impact timing and valve movement. Wear of rings, pistons and liners influences volumetric compression efficiency and combustion blow-by resulting in power loss. As has been previously reported in this magazine, particle-induced wear is greatest when the particle sizes are in the same range as the oil film thickness (Figure 2). For diesel and gasoline engines, there are a surprising number of laboratory and field studies that report the need to control particles below ten microns. One such study by GM concluded that, “controlling particles in the 3 to 10 micron range had the greatest impact on wear rates and that engine wear rates correlated directly to the dust concentration levels in the sump.”1
•Frictional Losses. When hard clear- ance-size particles disrupt oil films, including boundary chemical films, increased friction and wear will occur. One researcher reports that 40 to 50 percent of the friction losses of an engine are attributable to the ring/cylinder contacts, with two-thirds of the loss assigned to the upper compression ring.2 It has been documented that there is an extremely high level of sensitivity at the ring-to-cylinder zone of the engine to both oil- and air-borne contaminants. Hence, abrasive wear of the ring/cylinder area of the engine translates directly to increased friction, blow-by, compression losses and reduced fuel economy.
•Viscosity Churning Losses. Wear particles contribute to oxidative thickening of aged oil. High soot load and/or lack of soot dispersancy can also have a large impact on oil viscosity increases. Viscosity-related internal fluid friction not only increases fuel consumption but also generates more heat that can lead to premature degradation of additives and base oil oxidation.
•Stiction Losses. Deposits in the combustion chamber and valve area can lead to restriction movements in rings and valve control. When hard particle contamination agglomerates with soot and sludge to form adherent deposits between valves and guides, a tenacious interference, called stiction, results. Stiction causes power loss. It causes the timing of the port openings and closings to vary, leading to incomplete combustion and risk of backfiring. Advanced phases of this problem can lead to a burned valve seat.

What I take away from this article is a.) keep your oil changed regularly, and b.) change your oil and air filters, too, and c.) the more particulate and junk you have in your dirty oil, the harder your engine must work, and the less efficient it becomes. Pretty obvious stuff, but now you know why.
hmm, this looks informational. Put this in gen discussion?
 
  #2318  
Old 03-28-2012 | 10:48 PM
Worlok14's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,599
From: Indianapolis and Toledo
Default

******
 
  #2319  
Old 03-28-2012 | 10:53 PM
Dragone#19's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18,288
From: The Silver State
1st Gear Member
Default

sup worlok
 
  #2320  
Old 03-29-2012 | 02:45 PM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default

I would have read that but I skip it if there are 1 not enough paragraphs, and 2 if there are too many words. LOL
 


Quick Reply: I feel like whoring it up 2 (official new whoring thread)



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:36 AM.