05 636 dyno
#12
RE: 05 636 dyno
No Candylighting I dont think you understand what am talking about with the two sets of numbers. In colorado springs we are well over 6000 feet above sealevel which kills the power on a bike. I was able to make 109 at this altitude and 129 on the dyno at sea level. So yea it is worth it. I would take my bike over any bike with a power commander.
#15
RE: 05 636 dyno
My 03 pulled 107, essentially stock. Only blockoff plates and BMC filter that was dirty (said it was running rich)
Im interested in seeing what difference I get using 06 cams. I got a 06 head too, but not sure if I'm keeping it.
Im interested in seeing what difference I get using 06 cams. I got a 06 head too, but not sure if I'm keeping it.
#16
RE: 05 636 dyno
Well wish i had a working camera to shut up all the doubters but hey i know what my bike runs and i just think its funny guess youll just have to cough up th dough get it put it on and go to a real tuner and you will see until then I m done posting
#17
RE: 05 636 dyno
Well, you ain't worth a **** then. You say this works? Prove it. I would LOVE to buy a proven product, but I will NOT buy snake oil.
This forum is about HELPING others with Kawi bikes, not hiding things, so if you are not willing to show others a benefit that is being sold publicly, you may as well not even log on here. You are just wasting our time.
This forum is about HELPING others with Kawi bikes, not hiding things, so if you are not willing to show others a benefit that is being sold publicly, you may as well not even log on here. You are just wasting our time.
#18
RE: 05 636 dyno
Like I have said twice before unfortunatley I do not have a camera that works otherwise the dyno chart would have been up in the beginning. I am not tryin to sound arrogant by any means but I do not like when people doubt me. Im not the type to bull**** ie the other day some dude told me he squeezed a 750 in a 2007 gsxr 600 NOT POSSIBLE. This product works believe me I was all about pcIII until I was told about the Rapid Bike. After seeing how guys were just destroying the competition and talking with the guys at SR Tuning I was convinced and still am Rapid Bike is def the way to go. I mean now he has guys driving 8-10 hrs to have him do this he is that damn good. Sorry to get off on the wrong foot hopefully this clears it up a bit.
#19
RE: 05 636 dyno
I am not doubting ANYONE, but I would still like to see a dyno chart to see the results. Best bet would be a base line run and then an after mod run pulled off the same dyno since all dynos read different anyways. That will show true results rather than just one run with the mods since you can set up a dyno to read high if you want.
This is why I ALWAYS get a base run before doing anything and then do all subsequent runs on the SAME machine done in exactly the same method.
This is why I ALWAYS get a base run before doing anything and then do all subsequent runs on the SAME machine done in exactly the same method.
#20
RE: 05 636 dyno
i searched around and it does seem like people are catching on to the rapid bike. seems like mostly people that cant get a PC for there bike have to use the rapid bike. but i was thinking there both tuning devices , its all in the tuner, but that RB box is cool with its extra features that the pc should come with. youd have to spend about 1k to get that with pc.please correct me if i wrong anybody but fuel injection vehicles adjust to elevation and all other conditions which would keep the horsepower and torque pretty the same no matter what elevation, right?!