ZX7 lights switch mod , Marcelino method

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 08-31-2012 | 12:27 AM
ol'klx-er's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,800
From: kootenay country BC Canada
1st Gear Member
Red face

Originally Posted by rgoers
...with the Police in hot pursuit...
It's just the headlight that goes out, the tailight/plate light stays on ...
 
  #12  
Old 08-31-2012 | 02:44 AM
drm's Avatar
drm
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 547
From: middle tennessee; 600ft asl
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by EMS_0525
The light being on would have no effect on fuel economy.

So whats the point of this mod?
Maybe theoretically...less load on the alternator, less load on the engine, gnats *** better fuel economy.
 
  #13  
Old 08-31-2012 | 04:24 AM
RayCour's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 333
From: Quebec, Canada
1st Gear Member
Default

A simple calculation shows that fuel economy is not affected by switching the light off. Or by a so small amount as to be negligible.

However, there are a few situations where I would like to turn my headlight off. One of them : I had to let the bike idle for long times in one ride due to a broken starter button. When idling, the alternator cannot supply enough current for the headlight and all accessories, so the battery discharges slowly. I got to the point where I had to start the engine on compression.
 
  #14  
Old 08-31-2012 | 01:06 PM
djchan's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 470
Default

Originally Posted by rgoers
Serious??? Illegal to have lights on? Talk about a nanny-state... having someone tell you when you can and can't use your lights is going a bit overboard, don't you think?
...telling me that my lights must be on all the time - that's a nanny-state.
 
  #15  
Old 09-01-2012 | 02:21 AM
rgoers's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 854
From: Northern Utah
Default

Originally Posted by djchan
...telling me that my lights must be on all the time - that's a nanny-state.
I agree either way! No government should be telling us what to do, down to that level of detail. Let natural selection do its job with those who get culled because they didn't want to ride with their lights on... but let it be THEIR decision.
 
  #16  
Old 09-01-2012 | 04:39 AM
cmott426's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 840
From: Sandpoint Idaho
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by rgoers
I agree either way! No government should be telling us what to do, down to that level of detail. Let natural selection do its job with those who get culled because they didn't want to ride with their lights on... but let it be THEIR decision.
So you must think the same way about seat belts and helmets? Idaho does not have a helmet law, I always wear mine.
 
  #17  
Old 09-01-2012 | 09:12 AM
yankee99's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 71
From: pattaya, thailand
Default

Originally Posted by rgoers
Serious??? Illegal to have lights on? Talk about a nanny-state... having someone tell you when you can and can't use your lights is going a bit overboard, don't you think?
i am not sure i woulld call cambodia a nanny country but who wants a 2-3 dollar fine
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Marcelino
KLX 250S
1209
06-14-2024 05:58 PM
thekeeper199
KLX 250S
2
09-23-2014 02:33 AM
jhoffy22
KLX 250S
31
06-27-2011 11:25 PM
clb3carl
Classic Sportbikes
4
07-19-2010 08:26 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 AM.