Tires... How far to you dare wear it down
#11
I've got a new rear D606 130/90x18 I'm going to mount just for a couple D/S rides. The tire I have on now is ony about half gone, but I want new big sharp ***** for the D/S events.
Dan
Dan
#12
Hmmm I should probably try the research thing before I just vlurt out a dumb questions... but here it goes anyway...
Hypothetically:
If a buddy had the KLX250SF could we just swap rims and tires and try it out?
Or are they more different than that?
Hypothetically:
If a buddy had the KLX250SF could we just swap rims and tires and try it out?
Or are they more different than that?
#14
The k270 120/80 is between the 4.6 and 5.1 in width, it looks about the same height as the stock dunlop 4.6. Can post actual numbers when i get one mounted on a rim. But for now it looks to be a good oem refit size for the 250. Unless you wanted a tall tire to raise the bike or be able run lower psi, or raise the effective gearing, etc. then consider the 4.60.
#15
The k270 120/80 is between the 4.6 and 5.1 in width, it looks about the same height as the stock dunlop 4.6
I spend most of my time between 10-40mph. I probably would not care if my bike did not exceed 55mph.
I am looking forward to the post after you have it mounted on the rim. Snap a photo or two if ya can
Thanks!
I think I need one of those.
Last edited by SlapDrum; 10-08-2009 at 04:09 AM.
#16
Sorry it took so long, got the 120/80 mounted today, but it's going on my 250x instead.
The 120/80 mounted is 4.61" wide and 3.2" tall (vs. 4.2 x 3.8 for the 4.60) an inch shorter and almost a 1/2" wider. IMHO a better size than the other kendas for my little 250's.
I'm leaving the 4.60 on the klx, have been on a few good DS rides and it works fine, but next time I'll get the 120/80. There are pro's and cons of taller tire, pro is taller footpeg and case height, con is it gears the bike up a little noticable when crawling around in 1st.
how close the tall 4.6 is to the mud flap:
side by side, 120/80 on left, 4.60 on right:
another just for the heck of it, 4.60 on bike:
The 120/80 mounted is 4.61" wide and 3.2" tall (vs. 4.2 x 3.8 for the 4.60) an inch shorter and almost a 1/2" wider. IMHO a better size than the other kendas for my little 250's.
I'm leaving the 4.60 on the klx, have been on a few good DS rides and it works fine, but next time I'll get the 120/80. There are pro's and cons of taller tire, pro is taller footpeg and case height, con is it gears the bike up a little noticable when crawling around in 1st.
how close the tall 4.6 is to the mud flap:
side by side, 120/80 on left, 4.60 on right:
another just for the heck of it, 4.60 on bike:
Last edited by RimBender; 10-18-2009 at 01:50 AM.
#17
Great pics and great info thanks!!
I just got back from a ride to San Diego and back (F800GS ride on this one).
And they are here in my office. I got the 120/20 -18 for the rear and the 3.25-21 for the front.
I dont need a front yet, but it bumped it to within $2 of the free shipping mark. I got a new lens fro my Dragon goggles... I'll try blue
One more trip on the old stocker, then I'll swap.
I bought the 47T Rear too, I think I need a new chain before I can mount that sprocket....
BTW, tires look really big in my little office
I just got back from a ride to San Diego and back (F800GS ride on this one).
And they are here in my office. I got the 120/20 -18 for the rear and the 3.25-21 for the front.
I dont need a front yet, but it bumped it to within $2 of the free shipping mark. I got a new lens fro my Dragon goggles... I'll try blue
One more trip on the old stocker, then I'll swap.
I bought the 47T Rear too, I think I need a new chain before I can mount that sprocket....
BTW, tires look really big in my little office
#18
I bought the 47T Rear too, I think I need a new chain before I can mount that sprocket....
I have the 13T/47T sprocket setup now... YEAAA BABY!
OK... one more trip on the old tires
Last time out I did a burnout that threw a rooster tail of dirt about 20 feet!!! That is soooo much fun. I did have to lift the rear tire out of the hole I dug
#19
13T on front and 47T on Rear is a 520 x 110 chain.
That allows the rear tire to go pretty far back, but still have a little room left for adjustments.
Got it up to 69mph (indicated) I'll have to take the GPS to see what that really means in actual mph
Yeeeha it is fun!
That allows the rear tire to go pretty far back, but still have a little room left for adjustments.
Got it up to 69mph (indicated) I'll have to take the GPS to see what that really means in actual mph
Yeeeha it is fun!
#20
I just put K270 both front and rear and they are great! the 4.5 x 18 is definetly taller which is great. Took a few miles on road to break in and feel 100% secure but now I am leaning the turns and the off road traction is sweet! True 50/50 tire. The front is a bit narrow compared tothe stock Dunlap and I may have went larger if possible, maybe?? I did a lot of research and this was my top choice for price and user opinions. I wanted something I could actually run on the street to work and off road on the weekends that last a while. I am not much on changing tires every few miles nor can I afford it
My tires were very worn and the thought of a blowout was not worth it. I changed them myself for the first time - easy. I even felt goatheads sticking through my front tire rubber just waiting to pop my tire.... replace them tires!
My tires were very worn and the thought of a blowout was not worth it. I changed them myself for the first time - easy. I even felt goatheads sticking through my front tire rubber just waiting to pop my tire.... replace them tires!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NMbottlecap
Off Topic
11
11-04-2008 03:21 AM