Suspension - HELP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 10-16-2011, 03:16 PM
David R's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western NY
Posts: 695
Default

I put new valves in my front forks. Huge difference. Suspension was "compliant" if that is a word. Rear shock was OK for me.

This was on an SF which had stiffer springs front and back.

David
 
  #12  
Old 10-17-2011, 12:31 AM
IDRIDR's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 4,507
Default

Originally Posted by durielk
In lieu of re-valving, has anyone tried using thicker fork oil or changing the oil volume? I think my 07 could use a little firming up. It is basically stock & I am 170#, so I think the springs are very close.
go find some of zombywoof's posts on the subject. He did.
 
  #13  
Old 10-17-2011, 12:45 AM
TNC's Avatar
TNC
TNC is offline
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 5,050
Default

Originally Posted by durielk
In lieu of re-valving, has anyone tried using thicker fork oil or changing the oil volume? I think my 07 could use a little firming up. It is basically stock & I am 170#, so I think the springs are very close.
The main problem with the fork is that the stock compression piston won't flow enough oil for either hard fast hits or several successive hits. Going to heavier oil with the stock valving will only aggravate this problem. I think the "firming up" you feel you need is still in the spring department. I've heard some suggest the OEM front springs are more suited to a 140-150 pound rider. At 170 I'd think some .42 springs would be more suitable than the .38's that are stock. Heavier oil is not the solution IMO. Your rebound is going to slow down a good deal with thicker oil, and it's right at the limit of being too slow already IMO.
 
  #14  
Old 10-17-2011, 04:35 AM
Blackheart58's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 886
Default

Listen to TNC...
 
  #15  
Old 10-17-2011, 11:08 PM
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,389
Default

Yes listen to Blackheart
 
  #16  
Old 10-17-2011, 11:09 PM
redpillar's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,389
Default

If you doubt Blackheart, then listen to TNC
 
  #17  
Old 10-17-2011, 11:47 PM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 21,060
Default

Just stand up on the bumps, it works every time. LOL
 
  #18  
Old 10-18-2011, 05:14 AM
IDRIDR's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 4,507
Default

listen to redpillar!
 
  #19  
Old 10-18-2011, 05:27 AM
wynn711's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Central Kentucky
Posts: 150
Default

Listen to deej. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
 
  #20  
Old 10-18-2011, 11:05 AM
ns503's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Nova Scotia Toolies
Posts: 195
Default

Originally Posted by TNC
The main problem with the fork is that the stock compression piston won't flow enough oil for either hard fast hits or several successive hits. Going to heavier oil with the stock valving will only aggravate this problem. I think the "firming up" you feel you need is still in the spring department. I've heard some suggest the OEM front springs are more suited to a 140-150 pound rider. At 170 I'd think some .42 springs would be more suitable than the .38's that are stock. Heavier oil is not the solution IMO. Your rebound is going to slow down a good deal with thicker oil, and it's right at the limit of being too slow already IMO.
So then how bout thinner oil?
 


Quick Reply: Suspension - HELP



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 PM.