Speed Calculator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-04-2013, 06:29 PM
drm's Avatar
drm
drm is offline
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: middle tennessee; 600ft asl
Posts: 547
Cool Speed Calculator

I was curious about how the speed of the KLX250 was affected by gearing, tire sizing, etc. I know about gearing commander but wanted to work out the calculations myself.

I created a google sheet if anyone would like use it.
Speed Sheet

I have a GPS and eventually want to correlate my indicated speed to my GPS.
Long term, maybe add actual data from users to help others when a speed issue arises.

Any thoughts out there?
 
  #2  
Old 06-04-2013, 07:53 PM
zippets's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.E Michigan
Posts: 216
Default

i know that the stock gearing is a little low for the power output of the engine

i know that i went taller and had the bike actually hit the red line 10500 rpms

that was using 14t F / 48t R i think i was going 10500 @ 70

stock was allmost 14t F / 42t R 70 @ 7000 topped out @ 8200 rpms

im thinking if someone went 14t F / 44t R they should be able to hit well over 90 (theory)

but i believe i heard add 300 rpms per tooth in the rear
 
  #3  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:16 PM
Brieninsac's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,401
Default

Looks pretty similar to the Gearing Commander

Gearing Commander: Motorcycle Speed, RPM, Chain & Sprockets Calculator
 
  #4  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:17 PM
cmott426's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sandpoint Idaho
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by zippets
i know that the stock gearing is a little low for the power output of the engine

i know that i went taller and had the bike actually hit the red line 10500 rpms

that was using 14t F / 48t R i think i was going 10500 @ 70

stock was allmost 14t F / 42t R 70 @ 7000 topped out @ 8200 rpms

im thinking if someone went 14t F / 44t R they should be able to hit well over 90 (theory)

but i believe i heard add 300 rpms per tooth in the rear
For every tooth added or subtracted from the original 42 tooth rear changes the ratio by 2.3%. (.023)

So is you are going 70 MPH with stock rear and the engine is at 7000RPM. Then if you change out to a 45 (3 teeth larger) your RPM will be 7000 times 6.9% (2.3% x 3 teeth) equals 7483 rpm.
 
  #5  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:19 PM
cmott426's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sandpoint Idaho
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by zippets
i know that the stock gearing is a little low for the power output of the engine
i know that i went taller and had the bike actually hit the red line 10500 rpms

that was using 14t F / 48t R i think i was going 10500 @ 70

stock was allmost 14t F / 42t R 70 @ 7000 topped out @ 8200 rpms

im thinking if someone went 14t F / 44t R they should be able to hit well over 90 (theory)

but i believe i heard add 300 rpms per tooth in the rear
I would say it is a little high for stock power.
 
  #6  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:40 PM
Highbeam's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 740
Default

Yeah, zippets had it backwards. Low gearing is like first gear. Tall is like 6th.

I find the stock 14/42 gearing slightly too tall for the trail but want a taller gearing for the highway so I'm leaving it alone. Why on earth they didn't make 6th gear much taller I'll never know. We have a close ratio transmission but at least there are 6 gears.
 
  #7  
Old 06-05-2013, 02:07 AM
RayCour's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 333
Default

Originally Posted by Highbeam
Yeah, zippets had it backwards. Low gearing is like first gear. Tall is like 6th.

I find the stock 14/42 gearing slightly too tall for the trail but want a taller gearing for the highway so I'm leaving it alone. Why on earth they didn't make 6th gear much taller I'll never know. We have a close ratio transmission but at least there are 6 gears.
I fully agree with this: if 5 and 6 were more separated, we could gear it lower (ex: 14/46 or so) and still have reasonable rpm at highway speeds. That would be the best of both worlds: good for trails and highway. 5 and 6 are so close anyway that a little more separation would not be an annoyance.

It strikes me that Kawasaki did the reverse for the 09 and later, compared to 06-07: they made 5 and 6 closer, aggravating the situation. Apparently they thought not so many customers would have agreed with my views...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rlj
KLX 250S
3
01-15-2015 09:20 PM
Einfahrt
KLX 250S
1
03-13-2010 07:42 PM
shon
Off Topic
3
07-13-2005 05:27 PM
shawn_460
Ninja ZX-6R & ZX-6RR
11
07-07-2005 02:26 AM
greenrider
New Member Area
12
06-04-2005 05:28 PM



Quick Reply: Speed Calculator



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 AM.