report: CDI modification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-04-2007 | 08:43 PM
NavKLX's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69
From:
Default report: CDI modification

On December 29, 2006 I successfully installed the CDI from a 1997 KLX 250SR.
Here's my report on the install and my impressions after three months of riding with this mod.

First, the basic data:
[blockquote]
KLX 250 CDI
p/n = 21119-1579 ignitor
mass = 168 grams

KLX 250SRCDI
p/n = 21119-1416 ignitor
mass = 302 grams
cost = ¥28,245 Japanese Yen = $245 US Dollars[/blockquote]
Timing comparison:
[blockquote]
KLX 250
10 deg before TDC at 1300 rpm
25 deg before TDC at 5000 rpm
rev limiter kicks in around 10,500 rpm, kills spark around 11,000 rpm

KLX 250SR (this is the street-legal version of the KLX 250R previously sold in the US)
5 deg before TDC at 1700 rpm
40 deg before TDC at 5000 rpm
no rev limiter

KLX 300R
5 deg before TDC at 1700 rpm
40 deg before TDC at 3000 rpm
no rev limiter[/blockquote]

Why did I do this mod?
I wanted my KLX to be the surly dirt bike that it was originally designed to be, not the dumbed-down bike that I rode off the dealer's lot.

Do I like this mod?
Yes. While I can't tell any increase in power or torque, there is anoticableincrease in throttle response. There used to be a stutter when I'd whip the throttle open from idle position, but that's gone now. I find the low rpm range to be smoother and more stable than before. Also, the bike seems easier to start now.

Is it worth the cost?
Difficult question, but probably not. It's a lot of money for this level of performance enhancement, IMO. For a little more money you can get a carb with an accelerator pump.


Here's my write up on the installation:

Here's the wiring diagram that's been floated around this forum before. It's not entirely accurate. The KLX 250SR ignitor has a 4-pin connector, a 3-pin connector, and a 2-pin connector. The diagram below shows 3-pin, 3-pin, and 2-pin for the 250SR. Belowis the wiring scheme I used.

Name:  ign1.jpg
Views: 2887
Size:  32.4 KB

(black-yellow wire on 8-pin connector of bike)connects to(black-yellow wire of 3-pin connector on new CDI)
(brown wire on 8-pin connector of bike)connects to(white wire of 4-pin connector on new CDI)
(blue wire on 8-pin connector of bike)connects to(blue wire of 3-pin connector on new CDI)
(black-red wire on 8-pin connector of bike)connects to(black-red wire of 4-pin connector on new CDI)
(black-white wire on 4-pin connector of bike)connects to(grey wire of 4-pin connector on new CDI)

The 2-pin connectors of the bike and new CDI area direct plug-in.
All remaining wires are unnecessary (I cut mine off).

The first thing I did before cutting any wires was to test the new CDI to make sure it worked and that I had the right wiring scheme.

Name:  IMG_0805.jpg
Views: 3469
Size:  74.0 KB

I made little make-shift connectors to connect the different shaped plugs.

Name:  IMG_0826.jpg
Views: 2681
Size:  39.3 KB

Here's what it looked like when I connected it together with the test connectors.

Name:  IMG_0808.jpg
Views: 3613
Size:  67.5 KB

The 2-pin connectors are a direct plug in.

Name:  IMG_0809.jpg
Views: 2984
Size:  49.8 KB

I was amazed that the engine started and the bike ran on the first try with my test set up.

The new CDI is bigger than the stock one.

Name:  IMG_0824.jpg
Views: 3586
Size:  80.5 KB

I decided to mount it on top of my airbox lid where my snorkle used to be. To do that I had to modify my airbox lid. Here are the before and after shots.

Before:
Name:  IMG_0830.jpg
Views: 2699
Size:  58.1 KB

After:
Name:  IMG_0832.jpg
Views: 2671
Size:  49.0 KB

Next I mounted the new CDI on the airbox lid.

Name:  IMG_0834.jpg
Views: 2653
Size:  97.1 KB

Next I clipped off the old 3-pin and 4-pin connectors and re-wired with a new connector I bought at the hardware store.

Name:  IMG_0828.jpg
Views: 2632
Size:  49.5 KB

Name:  IMG_0835.jpg
Views: 2725
Size:  77.5 KB

Name:  IMG_0836.jpg
Views: 2610
Size:  48.1 KB

I clipped the wires on the bike and put on the new connector pieces there too.

Name:  IMG_0895.jpg
Views: 3124
Size:  62.0 KB

After installing the new CDI I found that the wires previously connected to the 8-pin and 4-pin connectors of the bike were getting pinched between the frame of the bike and the airbox lid. So I trimmed a bit of the rim off the lid. You can see the spot I trimmed off just above my fingers in the photo above.

Well, there you have it.I like this mod for the improved throttle response in the low rpm's andbecause it brings my bikecloser totheoff-road machineit was originally intended to be. This wasn't a difficult mod, but it was a bit expensive for the performance gains achieved. FWIW, I usually short shift and never get near where the rev limiter would be.

PS: I recently rode a friend's WR 250. It's a great bike, but it's got no where near the low-end grunt of the KLX. I think the KLX is a pretty amazing little machine for the price!
 
  #2  
Old 04-04-2007 | 09:01 PM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default RE: report: CDI modification

Great write up and pictures. I have been to the MX races and have heard the limiters and its designed to keep the bikes from blowing up, are you going to ride it past the red-line? Just curious.
 
  #3  
Old 04-04-2007 | 09:53 PM
EMS_0525's Avatar
Da dirty moderator
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,584
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default RE: report: CDI modification

deej you do know our bike has a rev limiter right?
 
  #4  
Old 04-04-2007 | 10:00 PM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default RE: report: CDI modification

ORIGINAL: EMS_0525

deej you do know our bike has a rev limiter right?
Of course I do, that's why I was asking him since the install that will eliminate the rev limiter is he going to push the bike past the design.
 
  #5  
Old 04-04-2007 | 11:43 PM
EMS_0525's Avatar
Da dirty moderator
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,584
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default RE: report: CDI modification

ok..... just checkin..
 
  #6  
Old 04-05-2007 | 12:03 AM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default RE: report: CDI modification

 
  #7  
Old 04-05-2007 | 02:02 AM
mooredan's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 422
From:
Default RE: report: CDI modification

KLX 250
10 deg before TDC at 1300 rpm
25 deg before TDC at 5000 rpm
rev limiter kicks in around 10,500 rpm, kills spark around 11,000 rpm

KLX 250SR (this is the street-legal version of the KLX 250R previously sold in the US)
5 deg before TDC at 1700 rpm
40 deg before TDC at 5000 rpm
no rev limiter
Advancing in one case and retarding in the other? Hmmm, can someone help us understand the difference with some technical analysis? Does this stuff go hand-in-hand with cam timing? That is, if you change one side of the equation, do you need to change the other side? ...or does it matter?

Can changing to a KLX250SR CDI really make a difference? If so, whats the theory behind the change.

Also, I think thatone of the inputs hanging out in thebreeze is the throttle position sensor. Can someone confirm that thisisn't an input in the KLX250SR CDI?

Thanks.
 
  #8  
Old 04-05-2007 | 03:11 AM
NavKLX's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69
From:
Default RE: report: CDI modification

ORIGINAL: deej

... are you going to ride it past the red-line? Just curious.
No. I almost never wind it out.
 
  #9  
Old 04-05-2007 | 03:17 AM
NavKLX's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69
From:
Default RE: report: CDI modification

ORIGINAL: mooredan

Can changing to a KLX250SR CDI really make a difference? If so, whats the theory behind the change.

Also, I think thatone of the inputs hanging out in thebreeze is the throttle position sensor. Can someone confirm that thisisn't an input in the KLX250SR CDI?

Thanks.
This mod is one of the most popular mods with guys who race the D-Trackers (motard version of the KLX) here in Japan. I think the theory is simply that the 250SR CDI has the timing curve that our bikes were originally designed to run. The current stock CDI is dumbed down from the original.

The 250SR CDI does eliminate the throttle position sensor.
 
  #10  
Old 04-05-2007 | 05:44 AM
tremor38's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,106
From: Misawa Japan
1st Gear Member
Default RE: report: CDI modification

Yes, my dealer is also using the SR CDI box on his bike and although a dyno won't show any diffence in HP or tourque, most riders report an improvement in throttle response.

Most people opt for the 250SR box instead of the KLX300R boxbecause the 300 ignitor advances too far, too quickly for our displacement. It has to do with keeping the low end torque optimal. The more retarded timing curve on the 250S has more to do with emissions than anything else. The cam profiles on the 250SR and 250S are identical, so that's not an issue.

You can also do the conversion completely plug-n-play here in Japan, but the they want almost 150.00USD for the adapter harness. Looking at the wiring diagrams for both bikes, it looks like the mod is fairly simple. I guess it's just a case of whether you want to be cutting and splicing the original wiring to save about $120.00US.



 



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM.