Our performance numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-08-2012 | 12:24 PM
stephenmarklay's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 583
From: Spokane, WA
Default Our performance numbers

Winter ’09/’10 Edition of MCN performance index

Make: Kawasaki KLX250S

Testing 12/09

$5299

Engine 1

Trans 6

HP:18.46 (same year SF tested 20.22)

Torque 12.71 (same year SF tested 13.95)

Weight: 293.5

Average MPG 52.4

Top Speed 83.4

0-60:12.34 (same year SF tested 8.81)

0-100 n/a

1/4 miles: 17.77 (same year SF tested 16.39)

1/4 mile speed 67.19 (same year SF tested 74.57)

Braking 60-0 142.2

power to weight 1:15.89

Lightweight Dual-Sport
 

Last edited by stephenmarklay; 05-08-2012 at 12:33 PM.
  #2  
Old 05-08-2012 | 03:13 PM
Pogiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 389
Default

They forgot 1 important variable.
The fun factor: 100%.
 
  #3  
Old 05-08-2012 | 04:23 PM
rgoers's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 854
From: Northern Utah
Default

Who cares??? Even if they cranked out 9 million HP... I wouldn't be caught dead riding a motard!!!
 
  #4  
Old 05-08-2012 | 07:11 PM
stephenmarklay's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 583
From: Spokane, WA
Default

I put it up for general interest. It was not meant to be negative. I was surprised at the faster 0-60 of the SF. It looks like the same had more HP but that may just be sample variation... I bet the weight of the tires/front wheel makes a big acceleration difference. More rotational mass to get moving.

I have no power mods and the bike is fine for me.
 
  #5  
Old 05-08-2012 | 07:19 PM
Websurfing101's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 177
From: Houston, TX
Default

Why does the SF model have more power?
 
  #6  
Old 05-09-2012 | 12:32 AM
stephenmarklay's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 583
From: Spokane, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Websurfing101
Why does the SF model have more power?

I am guessing random variation.
 
  #7  
Old 05-09-2012 | 12:50 AM
Borg's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 172
From: Guelph, ON
Default

Dyno run on a different (smaller) wheel size probably has something to do with it.
 
  #8  
Old 05-09-2012 | 12:55 AM
stephenmarklay's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 583
From: Spokane, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Websurfing101
Why does the SF model have more power?

I am guessing random variation.
 
  #9  
Old 05-09-2012 | 01:12 AM
cjbiker's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Default

Street tire vs semi-knobby tire.
 
  #10  
Old 05-09-2012 | 01:16 AM
Nobrakes's Avatar
Admin
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,269
Default

Originally Posted by cjbiker
Street tire vs semi-knobby tire.
Most likely.
 


Quick Reply: Our performance numbers



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 PM.