Larger fuel tank?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #121  
Old 03-27-2007 | 04:36 PM
Kawi Wawi's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 881
From: White Rock, BC
1st Gear Member
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

I would totally go with the IMS, except I just can't part with my stock fan and put those hack looking computer fans on there.
No offense, but even if they are water proof, they look like computer fans, and just don't look up to the task.

mhammer, I've run my tank dry on more than one occassion (not on purpose either).
That's what I hate about it - it looks like I've got a ton of gas and - oh - now I'm out of gas.
I've measured the gas required to fill it back up after running dry - it was about 10.5 litres (2.8 gallons).
And I measured the very first fill - 14 litres. that's damn near 1 gallon that won't come out.

Rocking and tilting the bike will get you another half mile, then it will start sputtering again.
It's just not feasible to rock and tilt - it only gets a splash of gas up into the petcock area.

 
  #122  
Old 03-27-2007 | 05:33 PM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

Well I have officially decided that I don't want to change the tank unless they come out with something that has at least 3.5 gallons and looks good. So far I haven't' seen anything out there.Sorry for the guys that have the Acerbis tank, but that thing does not compliment the bike. Thick wings?....No thanks. So for me its easier to take a couple of 2 litre coke or Pepsi bottles( didn't want to start a pop war) with me in a back pack for long off road trips. After they are emptied into the tank you can either bury them under a root wad (not recommended), or leave them in the pack, after all they will provide great protection if you are launched off the bike and land on your back.
 
  #123  
Old 03-27-2007 | 05:53 PM
JB1's Avatar
JB1
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 656
From: Houston
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

I dunno, to me an extra gallon of gas is pretty good imo. I cant wait to see the new clarke tank.
 
  #124  
Old 03-27-2007 | 07:53 PM
Ginsu4u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 234
From:
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

I'll take the extra gallon. 150 miles in the woods is a long way. I will still pack my 33oz containers though.

I'm sure you were kidding Deej, but pop bottles are not a good idea for a plethora of reasons.
 
  #125  
Old 03-27-2007 | 08:04 PM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

Actually I have read over on thumper talk that a lot of guys are doing that very thing, then ditching the bottles. I do have a couple of the 22 oz and one 33 oz gas bottle, but really to date I haven't had to use them, but I never regret taking them along. You never know.
 
  #126  
Old 03-27-2007 | 10:41 PM
YYY.GUY's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 966
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

I havetwo MSR 650 ml fuel bottles for camping stoves (its the middle sized one). They're designed for backpacking and rough handling, so I'm pretty sure I don't need a Nomex riding jersey. They fit in the Pelican case, which offers added protection, and at $12 each, I'm not likely to ditch them in the woods! . Thery're a bit of a pain when filling at the gas station, but not as much of a pain as running out of gas in the middle of the woods! [:@]

 
  #127  
Old 03-28-2007 | 12:20 AM
Nobrakes's Avatar
Admin
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,269
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?


ORIGINAL: deej
So for me its easier to take a couple of 2 litre coke or Pepsi bottles( didn't want to start a pop war) with me in a back pack for long off road trips. After they are emptied into the tank you can either bury them under a root wad (not recommended), or leave them in the pack, after all they will provide great protection if you are launched off the bike and land on your back.
Man I sure hope you're joking. Maybe I'm just a little humor impared today but carrying a few quarts of gasoline in an ultra-cheap container on your back has got to be one of the stupidest things I've heard suggested on this forum.

 
  #128  
Old 03-28-2007 | 12:28 AM
Silver_Otter's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 53
From: Bremerton Washington 98312
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

I agree!

I'm liking my Acerbis 3.7.


________
Belyndda live
 

Last edited by Silver_Otter; 09-18-2011 at 11:31 PM.
  #129  
Old 03-28-2007 | 12:33 AM
Silver's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

I agree!

I'm liking my Acerbis 3.7.

 
  #130  
Old 03-28-2007 | 01:18 AM
deej's Avatar
Your Humble Moderator/Admin
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,060
From: Washington
1st Gear Member
Default RE: Larger fuel tank?

I agree?

Name:  100_4932small.jpg
Views: 14
Size:  81.2 KB

"That's the stupidest thing I have ever heard." "That's ok we're gonna do a lot of stupid stuff together."
 


Quick Reply: Larger fuel tank?



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 PM.