Introduction and a few questions inside about a new KLX250S.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 08-01-2012 | 03:36 AM
RimBender's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 618
From: WA state
1st Gear Member
Default

2 reasons, and I may wrong. But one of the guys was here doing testing and found the bomb lost 1/2 hp over the klx headpipe.

the other is the cam timing at 1mm lift on the stock cams has no real overlap that pipe tuning would really benefit. The way the cam timing is back pressure is the only real help or hurt. The bomb being an ANTI resonant device, is neither helping or hurting the exhaust system tuning on this motor. If there was a longer "lowboy" style head pipe it would help more. Tuning wise the stock headpipe is too short, but with the cam timing it really doesn't matter much.
 
  #12  
Old 08-01-2012 | 11:44 AM
wildcard's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,414
From: Missouri
1st Gear Member
Default

i don't know about the stock displacement but i'm putting a full exhaust on my 331 -

Originally Posted by IDRIDR
Here are better copies of the charts posted above by ZRexRich. (ZRex - thanks for sending them over!)


Run #1= stock bike. Results: 19.30 hp and 13.12 ft. lbs. torque. Run conditions 74.86 deg., 30.15 in-Hg,humidity 16% SAE: 0.97






Run #2= Big bore only. Assuming this means stock pipe and jetting? Results:24.68 hp and 18.75 ft. lbs. torque. Run conditions: 76.09 deg., 29.81 in-Hg, humidity 22%, SAE: 0.98








Run #3= Big bore & FMF Powerbomb header/Q4 muffler. Results:28.30 hp and 20.04 ft. lbs. torque. Run conditions: 75.88 deg., 29.83 in-Hg, humidity 22%, SAE: 0.98







Run #4 Big bore, FMF Pwerbomb header/Q4 muffler, carb(was told the bike has a Mikuni pumper carb on it). Results: 29.51 hp and 21.28 ft. lbs. torque. Run conditions: 78.60 deg., 30.15 in-Hg, humidity 14%, SAE: .097








.

from thread https://www.kawasakiforums.com/forum...lx351sf-29316/
 
  #13  
Old 08-01-2012 | 01:26 PM
donaldor's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
From: OC, California
1st Gear Member
Default

I just finished those mods on my 2012. It's a world of difference from stock.

Instead of dropping $500+ on after market exhaust I bought a used exhaust system from 04 KLX300 on Ebay. This made a HUGE difference. Cost: $125.

I have an extra KLX300 header pipe for sale...
 
  #14  
Old 08-01-2012 | 03:51 PM
Websurfing101's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 177
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by wildcard
i don't know about the stock displacement but i'm putting a full exhaust on my 331 -




from thread https://www.kawasakiforums.com/forum...lx351sf-29316/
Those are some good numbers. Which 331 big bore kit did you install?
 
  #15  
Old 08-01-2012 | 04:28 PM
rgoers's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 854
From: Northern Utah
Default

Originally Posted by StopTheExcuses
Thanks!!



Oh yeah? That's what I like to hear. Noticeably quicker than stock? Is there a link on this forum to the KDX snorkel mod? I might be buying the bike asap so I want to do some research and already have some parts on the way. Thanks! Also, any pictures or vids of your bike?
Noticeable??? The stock bike couldn't get out of its own way. Now... If I were a wheelie-type guy, I am sure I could do 1st and 2nd gear wheelies easily with pretty much just the clutch and throttle. It pulls *that* hard now!!! BTW - I am not sure the KDX snorkel has any real benefit to it. I may go back and try the stock one again, as some report better performance with it. I did go with a rather obscure exhaust system, which may account for much of the added power. <DEP Exhaust"/> A bit of a warning though... I *DID* have to do some mods to make it fit... cutting down the flanged end of the pipe and welding a short (4" or so) piece of pipe on the end. Looks wicked cool, and sounds fantastic too... along with gobs of power... it's a winner!
 

Last edited by rgoers; 08-01-2012 at 04:32 PM.
  #16  
Old 08-01-2012 | 04:41 PM
NDKLX'd's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 90
From: Bismarck, ND
Default

Originally Posted by donaldor
I have an extra KLX300 header pipe for sale...
I'd get that if I was you. Has a larger diameter, although it's shorter and won't match up with the newer model aftermarket slip-ons. Then you'ld need to go with the klx300 slip on (stock or aftermarket)to match up. A used muff from a 300 would save $'s and you'ld still have a quieter exhaust (if that's what u want).
 
  #17  
Old 08-01-2012 | 07:28 PM
wildcard's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,414
From: Missouri
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by Websurfing101
Those are some good numbers. Which 331 big bore kit did you install?
I have a cycle pro 331, basically the same as the Kustom Kraft but uses a rebored rather than brand new cylinder.

Those aren't my dyno's BTW, see the thread I linked to at the bottom of my post if you want more info.

Originally Posted by NDKLX'd
I'd get that if I was you. Has a larger diameter, although it's shorter and won't match up with the newer model aftermarket slip-ons. Then you'ld need to go with the klx300 slip on (stock or aftermarket)to match up. A used muff from a 300 would save $'s and you'ld still have a quieter exhaust (if that's what u want).
The KLX300 header is the same diameter as the new model KLX's but is acutally LONGER than the new 250's. doubtful you would see performance gains other than just a better muffler if you went with a stock 300 exhaust IMO.
 
  #18  
Old 08-01-2012 | 08:18 PM
NDKLX'd's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 90
From: Bismarck, ND
Default

Originally Posted by wildcard
The KLX300 header is the same diameter as the new model KLX's but is acutally LONGER than the new 250's. doubtful you would see performance gains other than just a better muffler if you went with a stock 300 exhaust IMO.
Yeah, what he said. Don't know what my brain was quoting.
I'm running the FMF q4 with stock header on an '09. when coupled with the air box and jetting mods it made a night and day difference . But then again, so did the big bore kit later.
 
  #19  
Old 08-02-2012 | 12:11 AM
StopTheExcuses's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by donaldor
I just finished those mods on my 2012. It's a world of difference from stock.

Instead of dropping $500+ on after market exhaust I bought a used exhaust system from 04 KLX300 on Ebay. This made a HUGE difference. Cost: $125.

I have an extra KLX300 header pipe for sale...
That's good to hear. I was interested in the header pipe until I read the rest of the page...dang.


Originally Posted by rgoers
Noticeable??? The stock bike couldn't get out of its own way. Now... If I were a wheelie-type guy, I am sure I could do 1st and 2nd gear wheelies easily with pretty much just the clutch and throttle. It pulls *that* hard now!!! BTW - I am not sure the KDX snorkel has any real benefit to it. I may go back and try the stock one again, as some report better performance with it. I did go with a rather obscure exhaust system, which may account for much of the added power. <DEP Exhaust"/> A bit of a warning though... I *DID* have to do some mods to make it fit... cutting down the flanged end of the pipe and welding a short (4" or so) piece of pipe on the end. Looks wicked cool, and sounds fantastic too... along with gobs of power... it's a winner!
Now that's what I like to hear. Since I will be riding it on the street, I want it to have as much power as possible, but still be reliable. Know what I mean?

Originally Posted by wildcard
I have a cycle pro 331, basically the same as the Kustom Kraft but uses a rebored rather than brand new cylinder.

Those aren't my dyno's BTW, see the thread I linked to at the bottom of my post if you want more info.



The KLX300 header is the same diameter as the new model KLX's but is acutally LONGER than the new 250's. doubtful you would see performance gains other than just a better muffler if you went with a stock 300 exhaust IMO.
Thank you, very informative. The dyno graphs show huge promise. I'm def a dyno type of guy. I like to know before and after, as my hobbies include performance cars as well. However, a slight monkey wrench has been thrown into the plans. I read the thread on here about the 2013 Honda CRF250L that linked to other threads about it comparing the KLX and the CRF. Now I'm confused! It seems as if the CRF weighs more, but performs better, has newer technology and costs less. UGGGGGG, what to do! I already had all the performance mods on my watch list on ebay for the KLX!!
 

Last edited by StopTheExcuses; 08-02-2012 at 12:26 AM.
  #20  
Old 08-02-2012 | 12:55 AM
wildcard's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,414
From: Missouri
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by StopTheExcuses
I read the thread on here about the 2013 Honda CRF250L that linked to other threads about it comparing the KLX and the CRF. Now I'm confused! It seems as if the CRF weighs more, but performs better, has newer technology and costs less. UGGGGGG, what to do! I already had all the performance mods on my watch list on ebay for the KLX!!
In what ways does the honda perform better than the kawi ?

I wouldn't be surprised if the suspension was better from the factory as kawi did cheap out pretty bad on the valving of the KLX.

Engine output will likely be about the same stock, as i think the honda uses the same motor as the CBR250 so probably about 20-22hp.

Again, not trashing on the honda, but just not seeing what all the excitement is about on that bike.
 


Quick Reply: Introduction and a few questions inside about a new KLX250S.



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 PM.