Increased Travel For Suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-30-2011, 04:05 PM
Bazzy's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by TNC
Well, it's more the quality of travel (damping) and the stiffness of the forks that you're gaining with the KX or many other forks that you'd be swapping. Just more travel isn't always what you're looking for. My '06 has 11" of travel which is plenty with proper springs and upgraded damping like a Gold Valve kit or such. I really think you're starting off with the wrong bike with an SF if you're wanting very long travel...or maybe your concept of suspension performance and application needs rethinking.
I want the bike to be higher too as well as have better suspension.
 
  #12  
Old 05-30-2011, 04:12 PM
HeavyFuel's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: W. Oregon
Posts: 501
Default

Originally Posted by TNC
Well, it's more the quality of travel (damping) and the stiffness of the forks that you're gaining with the KX or many other forks that you'd be swapping. Just more travel isn't always what you're looking for. My '06 has 11" of travel which is plenty with proper springs and upgraded damping like a Gold Valve kit or such. I really think you're starting off with the wrong bike with an SF if you're wanting very long travel...or maybe your concept of suspension performance and application needs rethinking.
+1 TNC for your words of wisdom. I don't think he needs more travel as much as he needs stiffer springs and better damping. I think his bike is quite capable of handling the types of obstacles he wants to hit, it's just that the suspension wasn't set up with that type of riding in mind. One other thing I was thinking, if he he "raises the suspension", will the ride height increase raise the center of gravity of the bike and rider, thus decreasing the on-road handling and nimbleness of the bike?
 
  #13  
Old 05-30-2011, 07:39 PM
TNC's Avatar
TNC
TNC is offline
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 5,050
Default

Originally Posted by Bazzy
I want the bike to be higher too as well as have better suspension.
If you're wanting the bike to be "higher", I still think you've got the wrong bike to start with in an SF. You get an SF to be lower, and as Heavy is suggesting, to have a lower CofG. You need a regular S model if you want a taller bike with more clearance and more suspension...or another bike entirely. The damping and suspension travel on the SF is designed to perform at the height of the SF as delivered. You might go a bit lower and not get too weird in the handling department, but when you raise a shorter travel bike, I think you'll get some odd handling quirks.
 
  #14  
Old 05-31-2011, 02:52 AM
Bazzy's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by TNC
If you're wanting the bike to be "higher", I still think you've got the wrong bike to start with in an SF. You get an SF to be lower, and as Heavy is suggesting, to have a lower CofG. You need a regular S model if you want a taller bike with more clearance and more suspension...or another bike entirely. The damping and suspension travel on the SF is designed to perform at the height of the SF as delivered. You might go a bit lower and not get too weird in the handling department, but when you raise a shorter travel bike, I think you'll get some odd handling quirks.
You guys are funny.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mmurray70
KLX 250S
6
07-16-2024 07:26 PM
thinairflyer
KLX 250S
9
06-01-2013 02:07 AM
roadglider
KLX 250S
2
03-22-2009 12:06 AM
konacoiler
KLX 250S
20
07-15-2007 05:23 AM



Quick Reply: Increased Travel For Suspension



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:48 PM.