"Do not install KDX 200 snorkle"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-03-2012, 11:02 PM
2veedubs's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northern Kettle Moraine
Posts: 628
Default

Yes, but with a bit of noise reduction compared to just a hole in the lid.
 
  #12  
Old 05-04-2012, 01:20 AM
BigSky KLX's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 297
Default

I have run every combination.

Stock snorkel on a modded bike is horrible. Bike lost a considerable amount of power and ran like crap when I put it back in for a day.

KDX200 snorkle is the best combo I have tried.

Noticed no difference without a snorkel.

No lid is extremely loud and unpleasant to ride.
 
  #13  
Old 05-04-2012, 08:44 AM
kojack06's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by BigSky KLX
I have run every combination.

Stock snorkel on a modded bike is horrible. Bike lost a considerable amount of power and ran like crap when I put it back in for a day.

KDX200 snorkle is the best combo I have tried.

Noticed no difference without a snorkel.

No lid is extremely loud and unpleasant to ride.
I know this has been covered, but which year KDX snorkel to buy for my 2007? Thanks
 
  #14  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:20 PM
rgoers's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Websurfing101
I have the 128 main in right now and I am not impressed with the take off. I want the front wheel to come off the ground a little bit better. The mid and high is where it shines. I want the power to feel like that from low, mid and high speeds. Thinking about dropping down to 124 main as suggested by Mike at Dynojet to see where I am at....
If you only understood how the circuits in the carb work, you gave enough info to answer your own question.

What does the MAIN jet do? (3/4 - WOT) You said it is good there...
How about the needle? (1/4-3/4) You said it is good there...

Where are you having issues...??? At "take off" in your words... that would be (0-1/4) throttle. So what's left to tweak in the carb? Yep, pilot jet, or "fuel screw".
 
  #15  
Old 05-04-2012, 03:51 PM
Websurfing101's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 177
Default

I like the way you explain things Rgoers.
 
  #16  
Old 05-05-2012, 12:51 AM
BigSky KLX's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 297
Default

Originally Posted by kojack06
I know this has been covered, but which year KDX snorkel to buy for my 2007? Thanks
I believe I bought a 2004 or 2005 ? Can't remember but I think anything in the 2000's is all the same part. it is kawi part #14073
 

Last edited by BigSky KLX; 05-05-2012 at 12:58 AM.
  #17  
Old 05-05-2012, 09:31 AM
kojack06's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by BigSky KLX
I believe I bought a 2004 or 2005 ? Can't remember but I think anything in the 2000's is all the same part. it is kawi part #14073
Thanks!
 
  #18  
Old 05-08-2012, 04:37 PM
cjbiker's Avatar
Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Default Stock snorkel

There was a good discussion over on the ADVRider forum about this a few months ago. Search for the "Long term KLX250S review" thread. There are a few riders, myself included, that feel that correct jetting and the stock snorkel is the way to go. The popular trend is to remove the snorkel and jet the bike really rich. It will run fine this way, probably better than stock, but may not make any more power over good jetting with the stock snorkel.

The theory behind the snorkel is that the airbox is a Helmholtz resonator. It will flow more air at a certain RPM range than no airbox at all. This is to give the motor a boost at mid-rpm where 4 strokes tend to have a flat spot. Messing with the snorkel messes up the resonator.

I'd love to do some dyno runs with all the combinations of snorkels and airbox modifications, with the jetting set correctly for each setup, but I don't have the time or money to try that experiment.
 
  #19  
Old 05-08-2012, 05:41 PM
Websurfing101's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 177
Default

I tried running my bike with Dynojets instructions. They suggested that I use a 124 main jet. The bike was more responsive, started easier and ran good. However, I decided to go with the 128 main jet because it pulls a lot hard and faster than what was suggested by DJ. It starts perfect and is a whole lot more fun to ride. Everyone has their own tastes on how they want their bikes to perform.
 
  #20  
Old 05-08-2012, 06:04 PM
EMS_0525's Avatar
Da dirty moderator
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 12,584
Default

Originally Posted by cjbiker
but may not make any more power over good jetting with the stock snorkel.
Callin BS on this. more air, less restricted air going in and going out will free up more HP.
 


Quick Reply: "Do not install KDX 200 snorkle"



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 PM.