Another Exhaust Question... FMF vs. Muzzy :o

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-14-2010, 06:19 AM
wildcard's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,414
Default Another Exhaust Question... FMF vs. Muzzy :o

Sorry to add another thread to the previous billions in terms of exhaust, but my search didn't really turn up anything that was to the point i was looking for.

Basically my question is this, does the FMF megabomb header really do anything in terms of power gains ? I really like the look of the muzzy but i am intrigued by FMF's claims on power increases with the megabomb header.

The reason i ask is that the FMF header seems to be overly large and without a heat shield i am a bit concered about buring myself or setting my pants on fire with its giant "tumor".

I understand the benefits of an expansion chamber on two-stroke engines what with the added volumetric efficiency and exhaust pulsing all that, but is it really beneficial on a four-stroke engine with regards to the valves and all ?

It would seem to me from what i observe on supersport bikes that a large diameter free flowing exhaust pipe is all that is needed. I've never seen a sport bike (other than two-stroke machines) with expansion chambers.

Is this a attribute to single cylinder four-stroke engines, the need for an two-stroke style expansion chamber ? The klx is the first four-stroke thumper i've owned so i am sorry for my ignorance in the matter but any insight would be greatly appreciated.
 
  #2  
Old 08-14-2010, 02:37 PM
dan888's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 3,406
Default

I would have to see dyno charts before and after , before I spent a bunch of money on it. I have always thought they were a sales gimmick.
 
  #3  
Old 08-14-2010, 02:41 PM
Blackheart58's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 886
Default

Marketing loves things with catchy names....like Power Bomb. Maybe there is something to it, but, I'd have to see it on a dyno to believe it, and compare it back to back with others, and have the difference be repeatable with other dynos and bikes.
 
  #4  
Old 08-14-2010, 08:51 PM
Kobrakriss's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar Creek (fayetteville) NC
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by dan888
I would have to see dyno charts before and after , before I spent a bunch of money on it. I have always thought they were a sales gimmick.
I agree. Lets see some dyno charts FMF proving that expansion chamber works on a 250cc engine or some lap times to get a real would effect.

I would gladly pay the price if I knew it would increase power.
 
  #5  
Old 08-15-2010, 04:56 AM
punkenduro09's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Murrieta, Ca
Posts: 1,439
Default

do you think your actually going to feel .2 hp? if your worryed about looks then just get what you want and youll be happier in the end. sales gimmic or not, i got one.
 
  #6  
Old 08-15-2010, 07:32 AM
wildcard's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,414
Default

Originally Posted by punkenduro09
do you think your actually going to feel .2 hp? if your worryed about looks then just get what you want and youll be happier in the end. sales gimmic or not, i got one.
If it comes down to a level like that, I would rather have a traditional head pipe design.

My goal is a solid 30 hp with a BB351 and TM36-68. I'm going to have the head ported and polished as well.

I love this bike and even with the money i will sink into it with the BB and pipe, head work and carb i will still be less than a WR250 or something along those lines the way i figure.

Thanks for the replys at any rate.
 
  #7  
Old 08-15-2010, 01:28 PM
fgk228's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: sydney,australia
Posts: 399
Default

just go with the pipe you like the best, at the end of the day, it is the same engine, port, valves and all the pipes are similar size and straight through headers and slip on.

best thing i can suggest is wait till a 2nd hand one comes up and go for that.
 
  #8  
Old 08-16-2010, 04:40 AM
stellar_d's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,980
Default

Agreed go with the one that fits both your bike and your budget. I had the muzzy on mine and it fit really well. The only thing I didn't like about it is how far the can stuck out towards the back.

My brother has a big gun on his and it also fit really well, less the slight touching of the pipe to the air box. Big gun tucks away a bit more like a dirt bike.

Both had great power, no real difference in either other than looks and sound. I'm sure the FMF is similar.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mikefrommontreal
KLX 250S
22
05-22-2012 03:34 PM
frankb
KLX 250S
11
01-18-2010 05:14 PM
madf
KLX 250S
7
05-04-2008 11:20 PM
stellar_d
KLX 250S
16
08-02-2007 01:39 AM
Kawi Wawi
KLX 250S
6
07-16-2006 12:50 AM



Quick Reply: Another Exhaust Question... FMF vs. Muzzy :o



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:42 AM.