Another '09 Review
#1
05-15-2008, 09:48 PM
Another '09 Review
I just found this and thought I'd pass along:
http://www.motorcycle.com/manufactur...iew-79658.html
Where did the 16 pounds of extra weight come from? I know the spokes are thicker and the brake pads larger, but where is the bloat? Still, it was a very positive review.
Jeff
http://www.motorcycle.com/manufactur...iew-79658.html
Where did the 16 pounds of extra weight come from? I know the spokes are thicker and the brake pads larger, but where is the bloat? Still, it was a very positive review.
Jeff
#2
05-15-2008, 10:34 PM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 21,060
RE: Another '09 Review
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
#3
05-15-2008, 10:45 PM
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: deej
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
]
#5
05-16-2008, 12:59 AM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 21,060
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: SherpaDude
Yeah, I found that odd, too. Maybe it's all thatadded weight? []
ORIGINAL: deej
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
That's weird, it claims to get 50 mpg. Uhhhhh I get a consistent 60 and that's with the full muzzy, jetting 132 and 40, no air box lid, and 13-45 sprockets. Explain that to me.
]
Well if we go by that theory, then with me on my bike I should be getting 10 mpg..[8D][8D][8D].............wait............[&:]..
Or if I could lose 75 lbs, then I would get 100 mpg? I'm confused now.
#7
05-16-2008, 02:11 AM
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: KDXmike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
#9
05-16-2008, 02:19 AM
RE: Another '09 Review
ORIGINAL: KDXmike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
Worse than that it says "nearly" 50mpg. Where's IG? We need to get this straightened out
Mike
#10
05-16-2008, 02:27 AM
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,102
RE: Another '09 Review
That 16lbs probably came from all the C.A.R.B. equipment needed for C.A. models.