331cc report
#11
RE: 331cc report
This may be a stupid question but, does the pumper carb not require a choke because of the fuel jet it squirts when you open the throttle? Just curious as my bike requires a healthy dose of choke to fire it up if its been sitting for a few days, also what's this "hot start" that I've heard about? The other guy with the pumper on his KLX was it the 300 or 250?
#12
RE: 331cc report
The pumper will still have a choke, its job is to richen the mixture for starting by shuting off the air supply. I guess I haven't checked but assumed that our carbs have a accelerator pump that squirts fuel. Most CV carbs to have and I just assumed that this one does too. As far as the "hot start" goes, that is something comonly used on MX bikes. It actually leans the mixture to aid in starting when the engine is hot. ie when you're racing and for some odd reason you kill it and need to start really quick. The hot start is a lever located on the clutch side of the handle bars with a cable going to the carb. The carb must be set up for this.
#13
RE: 331cc report
My FCR does not have a choke. You can get it with the choke, but Jerry said the version of the carb that includes the choke simply will not fit in the KLX300 or KLX250 becuause it is too large. I was a bit concerned about this because I usually need to choke the CV to get it to start but Jerry assures me that a few twists of the throttle then crank and it will fire right up.
On the hot start - Jerry also said that's a lot less important if you have electric start so he said is wasn't really necessary. He did say it has been prepped for hot start so it can be added if needed, but he didn't seem to think it was necessary for us.
On the hot start - Jerry also said that's a lot less important if you have electric start so he said is wasn't really necessary. He did say it has been prepped for hot start so it can be added if needed, but he didn't seem to think it was necessary for us.
#14
RE: 331cc report
ORIGINAL: vfrpilot
I guess I haven't checked but assumed that our carbs have a accelerator pump that squirts fuel. Most CV carbs to have and I just assumed that this one does too.
I guess I haven't checked but assumed that our carbs have a accelerator pump that squirts fuel. Most CV carbs to have and I just assumed that this one does too.
#15
RE: 331cc report
Brian,
Excellent report! Of course, I'm kind of getting antsy now to order my stuff and follow your lead. More so every day.
I do have a question and a couple of comments.
First off, the question.
In the above picture, what is the modification on the water line for? Just an easy way to get all the liquid out of the system to remove the cylinder?
On the low end grunt or pulling power - a pumper carb is going to make a big difference. If you don't believe me, find a car with a Rochester carb on it. You can disconnect the the accelerator pump. Now drive the car - it loses all the ability to "jump" when you hit the accelerator! When you want throtle response, shoot the juice in the motor and hang on! Manufacturers have gone to the constant velocity type of carb to help meet increasing EPA restrictions and also to make the motors run at much difference altitudes. I mean a bike only needs one jet setting to work all over north America. Didn't say it worked good, it just works.
What gearing have you gone with? I'm very interested in that. I know when I was up at "Tour de Pisgah" I ran the bike from 4500 to 7500 rpm all day long and that seems to be it's "sweet spot". I'm kind of hoping that with the 331 cc displacement I can stop spinning it so fast when 'cruising' down the road. I would like to be able to cruise along at 75 mph at perhaps 6000 rpm in 6th.
I keep looking at the "Larry Roeseler's Favorite" grind for the KLX over at Web Cams Inc. I know the biggest difference you could make in a V-8 was by changing the camshaft. I'm thinking that still holds true. Of course, if you go too much lift or too much duration or too much overlap, it loses it's drivability niceness. I remember I put an "RV" grind into a 6 banger one time and it was an awesome little street car. The "Larry Roeseler Favorite" grind looks similar to that camshaft. Not a lot of lift, not a lot of duration and makes mid range power. The kind of riding I do - actually most of us do without realizing it - depends on mid range power. That 3500 to 7500 rpm band is where you spend the majority of your time.
Do you have a dyno in your area? I would love to find out what kind of power you are making. I'm betting close to 29 horses. Considering that you started with about 18, that's quite a good improvement.
Looking forward to hearing more.
Excellent report! Of course, I'm kind of getting antsy now to order my stuff and follow your lead. More so every day.
I do have a question and a couple of comments.
First off, the question.
In the above picture, what is the modification on the water line for? Just an easy way to get all the liquid out of the system to remove the cylinder?
On the low end grunt or pulling power - a pumper carb is going to make a big difference. If you don't believe me, find a car with a Rochester carb on it. You can disconnect the the accelerator pump. Now drive the car - it loses all the ability to "jump" when you hit the accelerator! When you want throtle response, shoot the juice in the motor and hang on! Manufacturers have gone to the constant velocity type of carb to help meet increasing EPA restrictions and also to make the motors run at much difference altitudes. I mean a bike only needs one jet setting to work all over north America. Didn't say it worked good, it just works.
What gearing have you gone with? I'm very interested in that. I know when I was up at "Tour de Pisgah" I ran the bike from 4500 to 7500 rpm all day long and that seems to be it's "sweet spot". I'm kind of hoping that with the 331 cc displacement I can stop spinning it so fast when 'cruising' down the road. I would like to be able to cruise along at 75 mph at perhaps 6000 rpm in 6th.
I keep looking at the "Larry Roeseler's Favorite" grind for the KLX over at Web Cams Inc. I know the biggest difference you could make in a V-8 was by changing the camshaft. I'm thinking that still holds true. Of course, if you go too much lift or too much duration or too much overlap, it loses it's drivability niceness. I remember I put an "RV" grind into a 6 banger one time and it was an awesome little street car. The "Larry Roeseler Favorite" grind looks similar to that camshaft. Not a lot of lift, not a lot of duration and makes mid range power. The kind of riding I do - actually most of us do without realizing it - depends on mid range power. That 3500 to 7500 rpm band is where you spend the majority of your time.
Do you have a dyno in your area? I would love to find out what kind of power you are making. I'm betting close to 29 horses. Considering that you started with about 18, that's quite a good improvement.
Looking forward to hearing more.
#16
RE: 331cc report
ORIGINAL: Marty
In the above picture, what is the modification on the water line for? Just an easy way to get all the liquid out of the system to remove the cylinder?
In the above picture, what is the modification on the water line for? Just an easy way to get all the liquid out of the system to remove the cylinder?
What gearing have you gone with? I'm very interested in that. I know when I was up at "Tour de Pisgah" I ran the bike from 4500 to 7500 rpm all day long and that seems to be it's "sweet spot". I'm kind of hoping that with the 331 cc displacement I can stop spinning it so fast when 'cruising' down the road. I would like to be able to cruise along at 75 mph at perhaps 6000 rpm in 6th.
Do you have a dyno in your area? I would love to find out what kind of power you are making. I'm betting close to 29 horses. Considering that you started with about 18, that's quite a good improvement.
#17
RE: 331cc report
First of all, I'm a new member to this forum and I just have to say that it's kick-butt! Thanks to all of you for such great information!
I had a KLR250, but traded it in on my KLX250, so I'm going to be modding up my bike real soon. However, I've been down the big-bore road before with my DR650 (644cc's to 675cc's) and more than a few small and big block Fords (my Mustang has a 351W stroked to 427ci). The secret to low-end power is in the head and the cams. The only problem is that changing cam profiles usually takes power away from one spot and adds it to another. So if you want more low-end torque, you'll probably lose some power from the top-end.
I did roughly the same mods on my DR650 that you would also do to a KLX250, but I wanted more. I got the big-bore kit, rejetted the stock CV carb, and experienced the same thing Nobrakes did - better, but not a great power increase. I then went to www.webcamshafts.com and ordered a new cam (there's only 1 on the DR650), and did a simple home polish job on the intake and exhaust ports. Nothing extreme here - just put a sanding roll on a Dremel and smooth out the rough casting.
All of that probably added 30-40% more low-end torque. On pavement, I can whack the throttle in 3rd gear and pop the front tire up. In the dirt, I simply can't get the big DR to hook-up, and if I did, I'd probably hurt myself! That's why I got the KLX250. After about 7,500 RPM, the power falls off, but with that much bottom-end, who cares.
Even if all you do is swap cams, you will definitely notice more low-end torque. It doesn't matter if the engine is 250cc's or 331cc's - but more cc's means more power. I checked the Web Cams website, and they make 3 different grinds for the the KLX250. You can check them out here. For low-end power, you'll want the middle cam.
I'm not trying to push Web Cams or anything, but right now I think they might be the only company that makes cams for the KLX250. I've used them before, and I have 6k miles on my DR650 with no reliability or rideability problems (starts right up, no lumpy idle).
Anyway, I'm telling you all of this to answer the question of "What next..." So if you thought you were all done spending money because there was nothing else to buy, well, don't turn down any overtime just yet. [sm=insomnia.gif] I'm just glad I actually had something to add to this forum. Thanks!
I had a KLR250, but traded it in on my KLX250, so I'm going to be modding up my bike real soon. However, I've been down the big-bore road before with my DR650 (644cc's to 675cc's) and more than a few small and big block Fords (my Mustang has a 351W stroked to 427ci). The secret to low-end power is in the head and the cams. The only problem is that changing cam profiles usually takes power away from one spot and adds it to another. So if you want more low-end torque, you'll probably lose some power from the top-end.
I did roughly the same mods on my DR650 that you would also do to a KLX250, but I wanted more. I got the big-bore kit, rejetted the stock CV carb, and experienced the same thing Nobrakes did - better, but not a great power increase. I then went to www.webcamshafts.com and ordered a new cam (there's only 1 on the DR650), and did a simple home polish job on the intake and exhaust ports. Nothing extreme here - just put a sanding roll on a Dremel and smooth out the rough casting.
All of that probably added 30-40% more low-end torque. On pavement, I can whack the throttle in 3rd gear and pop the front tire up. In the dirt, I simply can't get the big DR to hook-up, and if I did, I'd probably hurt myself! That's why I got the KLX250. After about 7,500 RPM, the power falls off, but with that much bottom-end, who cares.
Even if all you do is swap cams, you will definitely notice more low-end torque. It doesn't matter if the engine is 250cc's or 331cc's - but more cc's means more power. I checked the Web Cams website, and they make 3 different grinds for the the KLX250. You can check them out here. For low-end power, you'll want the middle cam.
I'm not trying to push Web Cams or anything, but right now I think they might be the only company that makes cams for the KLX250. I've used them before, and I have 6k miles on my DR650 with no reliability or rideability problems (starts right up, no lumpy idle).
Anyway, I'm telling you all of this to answer the question of "What next..." So if you thought you were all done spending money because there was nothing else to buy, well, don't turn down any overtime just yet. [sm=insomnia.gif] I'm just glad I actually had something to add to this forum. Thanks!
#19
RE: 331cc report
I think you will be very happy with the FCR carb. I have one now and it is completly different than a CV carb. It should do what you have been wanting all along, pop a big wheelie when you nail the throttle. Looking forward to your reaction to it.
#20
RE: 331cc report
ORIGINAL: bryantjt
This may be a stupid question but, does the pumper carb not require a choke because of the fuel jet it squirts when you open the throttle? Just curious as my bike requires a healthy dose of choke to fire it up if its been sitting for a few days, also what's this "hot start" that I've heard about? The other guy with the pumper on his KLX was it the 300 or 250?
This may be a stupid question but, does the pumper carb not require a choke because of the fuel jet it squirts when you open the throttle? Just curious as my bike requires a healthy dose of choke to fire it up if its been sitting for a few days, also what's this "hot start" that I've heard about? The other guy with the pumper on his KLX was it the 300 or 250?
A choke will help a pumper, but is an absolute necessity on the CVK.