300cc BBK FI question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 10-13-2020 | 07:49 AM
gronk's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 46
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by 640kilobyte
About "without a retune" i mean "increase flowrate to fit bigbore with approx original timings for stanalone EFI or EJK for 250cc".
In case keep working EFI closed loop and keep approx same mixture in original stok timings EFI will "autotune" within reasonable limits ("big hole and loud" exchaust and open intake with "high flowrate" filter out upper EFI limits and EJK can only help to increase them).
If you _not_ disconnect oxygen sensor from exchaust EFI will go to closed loop from ~2300rpm and correct injector timing by current situation using rough AFR data from oxygen sensor.
Does closed loop auto-adjustment affect the open-loop fuel map?
 
  #12  
Old 10-13-2020 | 09:26 AM
640kilobyte's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by gronk
Does closed loop auto-adjustment affect the open-loop fuel map?
The closed cycle of the injector actually does not have a working fuel map - the fuel is considered literally under the current conditions. In some cases, the target ARF/RPM is graph exist, but this is a very different thing.
The open loop is used in non-standard cases:
Engine starting.
From idle to about 2300 rpm - the catalyst is heated by exhaust gas afterburning through PAIR and the O2 sensor always shows a lean mixture.
Failure of secondary sensors as emergency situation (FI light on), when usually the engine goes to work on the crankshaft / camshaft position sensor, intake vacuum and temperature (or MAP) and the fuel map to "get to the nearest service".

As a result, it makes no sense to change fuel map of the closed cycle with the work data from the open - they either do not intersect in the work or it is important to have independent "reference" data.

The injectors are used on road bikes on a lean mixture due to fuel efficiency. Simply replacing the injector does not lead to the desired results on a closed operation algorithm (it's compensate changes). From this, all sorts of Jukebox appeared (Powercommnder, EJK and so on), which work perfectly to simple rich mixture within and the capabilities of the native nozzle are still enough (although this also has its own problems). Whis is why replacing the nozzle in a massively unknown modification.
 
  #13  
Old 10-13-2020 | 10:02 AM
gronk's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 46
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by 640kilobyte
The closed cycle of the injector actually does not have a working fuel map - the fuel is considered literally under the current conditions. In some cases, the target ARF/RPM is graph exist, but this is a very different thing.
The open loop is used in non-standard cases:
Engine starting.
From idle to about 2300 rpm - the catalyst is heated by exhaust gas afterburning through PAIR and the O2 sensor always shows a lean mixture.
Failure of secondary sensors as emergency situation (FI light on), when usually the engine goes to work on the crankshaft / camshaft position sensor, intake vacuum and temperature (or MAP) and the fuel map to "get to the nearest service".

As a result, it makes no sense to change fuel map of the closed cycle with the work data from the open - they either do not intersect in the work or it is important to have independent "reference" data.
Thanks for that. I theorized that maybe whatever compensation is applied to closed loop can be used to shift the map of the open loop. You start the bike cold at 12,000ft above sea. It starts rich, warms up, O2 senses rich mixture, ECU reduces fueling. Whatever the % reduction in fueling is calculated there could then be used to shift the whole fuel map for open loop in the same direction (toward lean, in this case) until the engine shuts off.

Originally Posted by 640kilobyte
The injectors are used on road bikes on a lean mixture due to fuel efficiency. Simply replacing the injector does not lead to the desired results on a closed operation algorithm (it's compensate changes). From this, all sorts of Jukebox appeared (Powercommnder, EJK and so on), which work perfectly to simple rich mixture within and the capabilities of the native nozzle are still enough (although this also has its own problems). Whis is why replacing the nozzle in a massively unknown modification.
Right. But for the big bore, it seems like an easier solution than a fuel tuner.
But for the stock piston, I don't know, if just opening intake and exhaust increases air enough to utilize a larger injector at standard cycle values. If the above scenario with fuel map adjustment doesn't occur for the open loop, you would still get the benefit of a larger injector, right? If there was an injector that only increased flow by 10% or so, it would be a good match for the uncorked bike with stock ECU. Am I wrong?
 
  #14  
Old 10-13-2020 | 12:03 PM
640kilobyte's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by gronk
Thanks for that. I theorized that maybe whatever compensation is applied to closed loop can be used to shift the map of the open loop. You start the bike cold at 12,000ft above sea. It starts rich, warms up, O2 senses rich mixture, ECU reduces fueling. Whatever the % reduction in fueling is calculated there could then be used to shift the whole fuel map for open loop in the same direction (toward lean, in this case) until the engine shuts off.
Altitude and temperature measured by group of "main" sensors (vacuum and incoming air temperature sensor, or MAP) and give a correction for open and closed cycles. Without them and the camshaft position sensor (at least), the motor simply will not start.

Originally Posted by gronk
Right. But for the big bore, it seems like an easier solution than a fuel tuner.
But for the stock piston, I don't know, if just opening intake and exhaust increases air enough to utilize a larger injector at standard cycle values. If the above scenario with fuel map adjustment doesn't occur for the open loop, you would still get the benefit of a larger injector, right? If there was an injector that only increased flow by 10% or so, it would be a good match for the uncorked bike with stock ECU. Am I wrong?
Main problem with startup and low rpm - EFI don't know how many fuel burned in fact, so it can't compensate and work on stock fuel map. It works only at start closed loop.

Without buying EJK-250cc on with KLX with a little tuning, a variable resistor will help. The air temperature sensor works simply - colder air, then more sensor rezistance, EFI think that more the engine will suck it in, which means the more fuel the injector need. So extra resistance -> more fuel at low rpm and startup. You can read more about the principle by searching for "Xt660 Kev fuel mod".

The difference between the native and the Suzuki nozzle is 22%. Need incrase to same 22% air to engine to make same mixture as original. Open lid will not give to much, so i think only will work "save" at fully tunned klx (high perfomance exhaust, air filter, open lid).

P.S. In don't know about same type injector with 10% increase. Next to stock 220cc/min is 260cc/min (+18%). Yes, 240cc injector will work good in 250cc as i think.
 

Last edited by 640kilobyte; 10-13-2020 at 12:14 PM.
  #15  
Old 10-13-2020 | 01:29 PM
durielk's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,728
From: Cottonwood, AZ USA
1st Gear Member
Default

I'm just going to pop in here and make a comment. I don't have FI, but if your messing with this, I just wanted to clarify a statement 640 made.
When temp drops, the resistance of wire decreases, not increases. I don't really know how the temp sensor works, but if it's just wire, the resistance will go down on temp drop.
 
  #16  
Old 10-13-2020 | 01:46 PM
640kilobyte's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by durielk
I'm just going to pop in here and make a comment. I don't have FI, but if your messing with this, I just wanted to clarify a statement 640 made.
When temp drops, the resistance of wire decreases, not increases. I don't really know how the temp sensor works, but if it's just wire, the resistance will go down on temp drop.
From EFI serivice maniual "FUEL SYSTEM (DFI) 3-53"

 
  #17  
Old 10-13-2020 | 01:50 PM
durielk's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,728
From: Cottonwood, AZ USA
1st Gear Member
Default

OK, looks like your on top of it. They must have some type of modulator inside that thing and not just running on wire resistance.
 
  #18  
Old 10-13-2020 | 02:27 PM
640kilobyte's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
1st Gear Member
Default

Originally Posted by durielk
OK, looks like your on top of it. They must have some type of modulator inside that thing and not just running on wire resistance.
It's just NTC thermistor inside. This solution is typical and quite simple.
 
  #19  
Old 11-19-2023 | 03:51 PM
lb-rider's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 10
1st Gear Member
Default

Hi,

My working setup for first 1000 km
2009- European OE ECU
292cc AHL
Suzuki injector 270cc like on other posts - look at eby or alixprs.. less than € 25,-
EFI body first plate removed
KDX snorkel
OE - Exhaust
O2- in use

Runs smooth, good throttle control
Have to check color of spark plug by time.





 

Last edited by lb-rider; 11-19-2023 at 04:03 PM. Reason: add images
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thekeeper199
KLX 250S
13
09-15-2020 04:20 AM
TNC
KLX 250S
5
09-23-2011 09:29 PM
dddowntown
Ninja ZX-6R & ZX-6RR
1
11-09-2007 11:19 PM
jt1414
Ninja ZX-6R & ZX-6RR
2
04-23-2007 07:11 AM



Quick Reply: 300cc BBK FI question.



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:33 PM.