300 / 331 / 340 / 350 cc kits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-08-2009, 03:35 AM
horizonod's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Blue Ridge N.C.
Posts: 229
Default 300 / 331 / 340 / 350 cc kits

Does anybody have any hard figures on the benefits or drawbacks of oversizing the KLX 250 jug?

Which kit offers the most bang for the buck?

The 350 kit is new and, while I'm sure BB knows what he is doing, seems it might be stretching the limitations of the original package a tad.

What's the scoop on the 331 and 340 kits? Where is the 340 available? Do they cost about the same?

I've got some Keihin 35mm FCR carbs coming and one of them is going on my KLX. The next big step after that is THE BIG bore!!

I know a few guys that are into dual sport riding. They ride a DRZ 400, DRZ 650 and an XR 650. They like the power on the black but not the weight woods. The trails here are pretty tight and light is good. One of them knows I've got this little KLX and took it for a spin before I did mod #1. "handles nice" was all he said.

None of the mods I'm doing will be obvious at first glance and I'd really like them to drop jaw and cream themselves when we take the lowly and light KLX for a romp with it's bigger badder cousins .

After the FCR and some suspension tweaks the big bore is topper. I'm trying to edumakate myself on the big bore options.

Any specs, recomendations, thoughts, availability options, pros n cons or just plain ol informed opinions are all greatly appreciated.
 
  #2  
Old 01-08-2009, 05:00 PM
cliffsta's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pineville, LA
Posts: 942
Default

I'm curious about the 300 myself...
 
  #3  
Old 01-08-2009, 07:40 PM
Bake's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by horizonod

The 350 kit is new and...seems it might be stretching the limitations of the original package.
The search for maximum performance is by definition taking it to the limit. I've ridden the 351 and the 300. Both are great choices. I think Bill Blue will be glad to discuss the different sizes with you if you contact him directly.
 

Last edited by Bake; 01-08-2009 at 07:44 PM.
  #4  
Old 01-08-2009, 09:57 PM
ddt1972's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 477
Default

As long as the 351 piston is close in weight to the 250 or 300, it would not be stretching the limit that much at all. The bottom end of this engine is pretty strong, and should handle these upgrades just fine.
 
  #5  
Old 01-08-2009, 10:47 PM
cliffsta's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pineville, LA
Posts: 942
Default

I know this is noob-ish, but can someone explain the whole idea of the "300" to me? Isn't it just changing out a piece of the motor? As in, NOT boring out the cylinder? Its just a different bottom end, correct? Link to some information? Or an explanation? I'm just kinda curious. I don't wanna bore out my motor, but I'm interested in a bit more power but still reliable (in addition to exhaust and carby, which I'ma do first... I'm just trying to learn).
 
  #6  
Old 01-08-2009, 10:54 PM
tremor38's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Misawa Japan
Posts: 3,106
Default

Originally Posted by ddt1972
As long as the 351 piston is close in weight to the 250 or 300, it would not be stretching the limit that much at all. The bottom end of this engine is pretty strong, and should handle these upgrades just fine.
yup, I agree.
 
  #7  
Old 01-08-2009, 11:28 PM
JasonFMX's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 960
Default

Originally Posted by cliffsta
I know this is noob-ish, but can someone explain the whole idea of the "300" to me? Isn't it just changing out a piece of the motor? As in, NOT boring out the cylinder? Its just a different bottom end, correct? Link to some information? Or an explanation? I'm just kinda curious. I don't wanna bore out my motor, but I'm interested in a bit more power but still reliable (in addition to exhaust and carby, which I'ma do first... I'm just trying to learn).
You exchange the cylinder, not the bottom end. While you yourself would not be boring anything you would have to purchase a new cylinder with a larger bore and replace your stock 250 one.
________
Fetish Vids
 

Last edited by JasonFMX; 03-29-2011 at 08:43 AM.
  #8  
Old 01-08-2009, 11:28 PM
Bake's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by ddt1972
As long as the 351 piston is close in weight to the 250 or 300, it would not be stretching the limit that much at all. The bottom end of this engine is pretty strong, and should handle these upgrades just fine.
My understanding is Bill specifically designed the 351 piston to weigh the same as the 300.
 
  #9  
Old 01-08-2009, 11:31 PM
JasonFMX's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 960
Default

After putting ina 350 kit, pipe, jet kit/carb, air filter, etc etc..... first thing I would be worried about is the clutch.... not the bottom end or piston weight.
________
Uggs
 

Last edited by JasonFMX; 03-29-2011 at 08:43 AM.
  #10  
Old 01-08-2009, 11:34 PM
cliffsta's Avatar
Senior Member
1st Gear Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pineville, LA
Posts: 942
Default

Originally Posted by JasonFMX
You exchange the cylinder, not the bottom end. While you yourself would not be boring anything you would have to purchase a new cylinder with a larger bore and replace your stock 250 one.
So basically I'd be buying a new piston and cylinder, and installing it underneath my stock top end and inside the 250 case and outter guts?
 


Quick Reply: 300 / 331 / 340 / 350 cc kits



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 PM.